<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drowning in Swim Lanes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.danmcweeney.com/47/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.danmcweeney.com/47</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:38:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo Santella</title>
		<link>http://blog.danmcweeney.com/47/comment-page-1#comment-104751</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo Santella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.danmcweeney.com/47#comment-104751</guid>
		<description>Every time I see blogs as very good as this since I must cease bludging and begin working on mine.Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time I see blogs as very good as this since I must cease bludging and begin working on mine.Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kara Denna</title>
		<link>http://blog.danmcweeney.com/47/comment-page-1#comment-103691</link>
		<dc:creator>Kara Denna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 04:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.danmcweeney.com/47#comment-103691</guid>
		<description>I’m particularly impressed with your crafting expertise and with the format on your weblog. Is that  a paid theme or did you customize it yourself? Either way retain up the nice quality composing, it is uncommon to see a great blog prefer it one today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m particularly impressed with your crafting expertise and with the format on your weblog. Is that  a paid theme or did you customize it yourself? Either way retain up the nice quality composing, it is uncommon to see a great blog prefer it one today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.danmcweeney.com/47/comment-page-1#comment-4611</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.danmcweeney.com/47#comment-4611</guid>
		<description>&quot;Specialisation requires starting from a strong generalist foundation.&quot; So true but somehow I feel this is over looked in traditional enterprises.  Think of how valued &quot;rotational&quot; programs are but, how few of them exist.  Seeing the broad to understand the narrow is a great skill to possess-- sadly it usually takes vast amounts of time to perfect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Specialisation requires starting from a strong generalist foundation.&#8221; So true but somehow I feel this is over looked in traditional enterprises.  Think of how valued &#8220;rotational&#8221; programs are but, how few of them exist.  Seeing the broad to understand the narrow is a great skill to possess&#8211; sadly it usually takes vast amounts of time to perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Otter</title>
		<link>http://blog.danmcweeney.com/47/comment-page-1#comment-4607</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Otter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.danmcweeney.com/47#comment-4607</guid>
		<description>Dan.
Thoughtful stuff.
I think software can learn a lot from other disciplines. 
Look at law. Barrister-solicitor.
Look at Buildings. Architect and engineer.
Look at Medicine. Radiologist - Surgeon.
etc
Specialisation requires starting from a strong generalist foundation. Part of the problems with building software is that we dont really have a coherent idea of what the discipline actually consists of. We are still largely in craft mode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan.<br />
Thoughtful stuff.<br />
I think software can learn a lot from other disciplines.<br />
Look at law. Barrister-solicitor.<br />
Look at Buildings. Architect and engineer.<br />
Look at Medicine. Radiologist &#8211; Surgeon.<br />
etc<br />
Specialisation requires starting from a strong generalist foundation. Part of the problems with building software is that we dont really have a coherent idea of what the discipline actually consists of. We are still largely in craft mode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

